Human Stock Exchange

Man, in the world we live in today, anyone can argue anything. You take any situation, to a certain extent, and put a smart enough guy in there, he’ll figure out a way to make himself right. He’ll essentially beat the court of law, with persuasion. He’ll convince people that something immoral or unjust is okay, and still be able to righteously stand within a civil society.

Does that put the flaw on him or on society for having defined itself by a system that could be beaten by a man and made the man think he was still walking in the righteous path. Every society needs a court of law, something to base judgment on. And I think this law should stand as nothing more than a moral obligation to mankind defined by our basic human rights.

You say, this is what we have done. Yes it is. But because of the immoral acts people can get away with now, there is plenty of room for improvement.

The law of man should be to protect and prosper other men. Where are these lines drawn? I think all we should think about is to help the poor. That is all. Who are the poor people?

The economy should crash. There’s too much money in the world. Everything will get cheap again.

I want to make a lot off money because I want to prove that not going the traditional route is possible. Money is a huge recruiting incentive these days.

Buy stock, Prosper.com.
Sell yourself on the goodwill of others.
Have them share your winnings.
The best gambling is on people’s goodwill to succeed at what they say they will.
It’s good to gamble when you gamble on people’s success.

We gotta start a business where we improve people’s business’s by using the Internet. We’ll share profits and get paid upfront not by the company, by Prosper.com-like idea. We can charge whatever we want. Internet consultants.
By advertising on newsjog, you’ll be offering your ideas as to how to improve something, you can discuss it with people, then submit an entry to either prosper or kiva for funding.